A RESPONSE TO MONEY FOR NOTHING
In response to the critique titled "Money for nothing?" published on October 18, 2011, by John Quiggin, this response aims to address the concerns raised by the author regarding Modern Monetary Theory (MMT). The author argues that MMT's perspective on government expenditure and taxation is:
(a) wrong in terms of the central claims of MMT,
(b) regressive in terms of taxation policy and
(c) politically pernicious.
In line with my understanding of MMT, I will provide a comprehensive defence that addresses both the key points and the more specific concerns raised by the author.
(a) MMT and functional finance
The author misinterprets MMT as suggesting that taxation is not required to finance public expenditure in the conventional sense.
MMT does not argue for zero taxation; it recognises taxes as essential for various reasons, such as providing value to the currency, managing inflation, redistributing income and wealth, and encouraging or discouraging certain behaviours.
MMT emphasises that a government with its own currency cannot run out of money, making it less constrained by budget deficits in terms of spending.
However, it does not advocate for unlimited spending without considering inflationary pressures and resource constraints.
Governments can adjust fiscal and monetary policy tools, such as interest rates and implementing a Job Guarantee program, to accommodate the desired level of public expenditure while managing inflation and resource constraints.
(b) Regressive taxation policy
The author argues that an increase in public expenditure without corresponding changes in macroeconomic policy settings would necessarily lead to higher taxes. MMT acknowledges that tax policy should be designed with equity in mind, and it does not inherently promote regressive taxation.
Regarding inflation, MMT posits that inflation is primarily driven by supply-side factors, such as resource constraints, and not by government spending per se.
A well-designed Job Guarantee program can help maintain full employment without causing excessive inflation.
(c) Political implications
The author claims that the idea that government expenditure does not require taxation in the traditional sense is politically pernicious.
However, MMT does not argue for the absence of taxes. Instead, it offers a different perspective on the role of taxes and government spending in the economy.
MMT seeks to challenge austerity measures and encourages policymakers to focus on achieving full employment, price stability, and equitable growth rather than solely on balancing budgets.
The political implications of MMT should be seen as a call for rethinking economic policy priorities rather than as offering a "free lunch."
(d) Addressing specific concerns
Increase in public expenditure and macroeconomic policy settings:
Governments can adjust fiscal and monetary policy tools to accommodate the desired level of public expenditure, such as increasing government spending to stimulate the economy, altering interest rates, or implementing a Job Guarantee program.
Temporary public expenditure and public debt:
MMT views government debt differently, arguing that it represents financial assets held by the private sector. Since the government can always create more currency to meet its debt obligations, servicing public debt is not a significant constraint on fiscal policy.
Full employment, inflation, and taxation:
MMT asserts that a well-designed Job Guarantee program can help maintain full employment without causing excessive inflation. Appropriate fiscal and monetary policy measures can also be used to manage inflationary pressures.
Taxation as the price of civilisation:
MMT highlights the need to understand the true capabilities of governments with sovereign currencies and advocates for using fiscal policy to advance social and economic goals while maintaining a responsible approach to taxation.
The critiques raised by John Quiggin regarding Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) primarily stem from misunderstandings and misinterpretations of its central claims and implications.
MMT offers a fresh perspective on government expenditure, taxation, and economic policy that focuses on real-world constraints such as inflation and resource availability rather than arbitrary budgetary targets.
By advocating for full employment, price stability, and equitable growth, MMT encourages a reevaluation of economic policy priorities to better serve the needs of society.
It is crucial to engage in open and informed discussions about MMT and its potential implications to ensure that we make well-informed decisions about the future of our economic systems.
Achieve Financial and Mental Wellness
Looking for effective resources to help overcome financial stress and anxious thoughts? This subscription has you covered.
As a paying subscriber, gain unlimited access to 5 powerful tools absolutely free:
A comprehensive eBook guides transforming your finances through proven habits and strategies.
4 Anxiety-Busting wall posters that provide techniques to quiet worried thoughts and build resilience. Great for personal or professional use!
Whether you seek tools for personal growth or your mental health practice, these science-backed resources can significantly boost well-being over the long run.
Subscribe now to empower yourself and your clients with an all-inclusive wellness toolkit. Finally, take command of money mindsets and unlock healthier, wealthier lives for all. Your future of financial peace and mental ease is just a click away!
If you enjoyed this post, please consider buying me a coffee by pressing the button below.